How to evaluate STT APIs for data security and compliance
Published on June 20, 2025
The right speech-to-text (STT) API has to do more than just transcribe audio quickly and accurately. It must also handle data safely to meet compliance standards and user expectations. This is the case in all industries, from CCaaS and CPaaS providers to those operating in more regulated industries like finance and healthcare.
Every organization using STT APIs—whether for external conversations or internal knowledge management—needs to take a serious look at the basics:
Is data encrypted in transit and at rest, and how is sensitive information protected?
Who has access to transcripts, and how is that access controlled?
What happens if something goes wrong? Is there a clear incident response plan?
You don’t need to be a security expert to ask the right questions. But you do need to treat security and compliance as a core part of evaluating any STT vendor. Keep reading to learn what questions to ask yourself and vendors to ensure the API is up to scratch.
Key takeaways:
You must clarify your own security and compliance requirements first, including regulations, data sensitivity, and access needs—before evaluating STT vendors.
Ask the right questions about vendor security practices, such as encryption, access controls, certifications, and data residency options.
Prioritize vendors that offer granular control and transparency, with features like role-based access, configurable data retention, and support for industry-specific compliance standards.
How to evaluate potential STT APIs
From a compliance perspective, choosing the right speech-to-text API starts with understanding your own requirements. You may only need to meet the broad, basic data protection rules in place in your country or state.
But depending on the industries you serve and how long you need to keep data, you may have to meet very specific regulations. So before you start evaluating potential partners, first get clear on the following:
Questions to ask yourself
What regulatory frameworks do I have to comply with?
What types of sensitive data will our STT system process?
Who needs access to transcription data, and how should permissions be managed?
We’ll go into much more detail on each of these shortly. Once you’re clear on your own needs, you can start assessing how each API partner can help. These are the questions to ask as you make your evaluation:
Questions to ask vendors
How do you ensure secure API authentication and prevent unauthorized access?
What security certifications and compliance frameworks do you support?
How is audio data transmitted, stored, and encrypted?
Can we control data residency for compliance purposes?
What access controls and user permissions are available?
What are your policies on data retention and deletion?
Let’s unpack each of these questions in more detail.
Key questions to ask yourself
The following three questions must be carefully considered at the leadership level. The answers you come to should be documented so that every internal (and eventually external) stakeholder is crystal clear.
What regulatory standards do I have to comply with?
When integrating a speech-to-text (STT) API, it's important to understand which data protection standards apply. These vary based on your users, your customers, and the kinds of data you're handling. Specific industries have additional compliance regulations, and some regulations apply only in certain regions.
Here's a breakdown of some of the most significant frameworks:
ISO 27001 (plus ISO 27017 / 27018): A global standard widely recognized across sectors and key to securing enterprise deals. ISO 27017 and 27018 add specific guidelines for cloud services and personal data protection.
SOC 2 Type II: A U.S.-based auditing framework that assesses how well a technology provider secures customer data. Type II certification confirms that security and privacy controls are not only in place, but also tested and effective over time. Also important for enterprise customers.
GDPR (EU/UK): The General Data Protection Regulation applies to companies handling personal data from EU or UK citizens, regardless of where the company is based.
CCPA (California, US): Similar to GDPR in Europe, the California Consumer Privacy Act grants California residents rights over their personal data. Even companies outside the state may be affected if they serve Californian users.
HIPAA (US healthcare): The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act protects medical data in the U.S. If your STT service processes conversations that include protected health information (PHI), it must meet HIPAA requirements.
PCI DSS (payments):The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard applies when voice systems capture credit card numbers or payment details. STT providers must either comply or ensure sensitive segments are excluded from transcription.
CJIS (US law enforcement data): The Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) standard governs how police and law enforcement data is handled in the U.S. Only necessary for platforms working with law enforcement or justice-related clients.
FedRAMP (U.S. federal agencies): The Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) sets cybersecurity requirements for cloud services used by U.S. government agencies. This is essential if you support public-sector clients but also signals strong security credentials in general.
What types of sensitive data will our STT system process?
When people speak to a sales rep, support agent, or virtual assistant, they can easily share personal or regulated information, even without realizing it. This is then transcribed, processed, analyzed, and stored.
A speech-to-text system may process the following types of sensitive data, and will therefore need certain protections in place:
Personally identifiable information (PII): Includes names, email addresses, phone numbers, home addresses, or other details that can directly or indirectly identify someone. PII is frequently mentioned in customer service calls, making it subject to data protection laws like GDPR and CCPA.
Payment information (PCI Data): Covers credit card numbers, billing addresses, or CVV codes spoken during a transaction. If this data is transcribed or stored, it falls under PCI DSS requirements, which demand strong encryption and secure handling.
Protected health information (PHI): Any spoken references to medical conditions, treatments, medications, or healthcare providers can be classified as PHI under HIPAA. Especially relevant for platforms serving telehealth providers or healthcare contact centers.
Authentication credentials: Customers may say passwords, PINs, or answers to security questions aloud. If transcribed or stored, this data becomes a high-risk target for attackers and must be tightly protected or redacted in real time.
Legal or law enforcement information: Calls with legal advisors, or conversations involving law enforcement, can include privileged or classified content. If your platform is used in these settings, compliance with standards like CJIS or legal privilege rules may be necessary.
Confidential business or IP content: B2B or internal calls often include sensitive company strategies, client details, or intellectual property. Transcribing internal meetings, sales pitches, or support escalations means your STT system may process proprietary or contractually confidential data.
Biometric voiceprints: While not typical for basic transcription, some voice systems analyze vocal characteristics for authentication. In those cases, voice becomes a biometric identifier, regulated under specific laws like BIPA (Illinois) or GDPR’s special category data rules.
Who needs access to transcription data?
Not everyone in your organization needs access to raw transcripts or audio. Limiting that access is a key part of protecting sensitive data.
Think in terms of "least privilege": only give people access to what they need to do their jobs. These questions help to clarify boundaries:
Who typically needs access? Teams like customer support, sales operations, quality assurance (QA), compliance, and sometimes product or analytics may need to review transcripts. For example, QA might review calls for training or coaching, while compliance may audit conversations for policy violations.
How should permissions be structured? Use role-based access control (RBAC) to assign data access by function—not by individual. For example, support team leads might see transcripts from their team’s calls, while analysts only access anonymized data. Avoid “all-access” roles unless absolutely necessary.
What should be restricted? Raw audio, full transcripts, or calls containing PII, PHI, or financial information should be tightly restricted. Consider auto-redaction features to remove sensitive information before broader sharing.
What else to consider? Track who accesses what using audit logs, and regularly review access permissions. If your STT platform supports it, enable features like temporary access or data masking for non-privileged users.
Managing access carefully reduces the risk of internal data leaks, ensures compliance with data protection laws, and builds trust with your customers.
Questions to ask vendors
Once all of the above is clear, you can confidently begin quizzing API vendors. You want to be sure that they’ll help you achieve the specific standards you need, as well as being broadly compliant in their own right.
How do you ensure secure API authentication and prevent unauthorized access?
When your platform connects to a STT API, you’re exchanging sensitive data. It’s essential that access is tightly controlled. API keys or tokens should be unique, securely stored, and never hardcoded into front-end applications.
Ask the vendor for their key rotation and expiration policies. Audit logs are also critical to identify suspicious behavior or misconfigured access. You should also ask if the vendor supports fine-grained access scopes, so that different services or users can access only what they need.
OAuth 2.0 support is a strong sign of mature authentication. This allows secure delegated access with limited scopes. IP allowlisting and rate limiting can further protect your integration from unauthorized or abusive use.
What security certifications and compliance frameworks do you support?
Certifications are an easy way to verify that an STT provider follows industry best practices and regulatory requirements. We’ve already seen the main ones above, and it’s important to ensure providers have these.
Look for widely recognized security certifications like ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, or FedRAMP (for U.S. public-sector needs). These validate how the provider handles data security, infrastructure, and operational controls.
If your use case involves sensitive data, ask about HIPAA (for healthcare), PCI DSS (for payments), or CJIS (for law enforcement).
For companies handling data from the EU, UK, or California, ensure the provider is compliant with GDPR and CCPA, including support for data subject rights and cross-border data safeguards.
Ask where and how often these audits are conducted, and if you can review compliance reports (through AWS Artifact or vendor trust centers). And if the certification hasn’t been updated in some time, find out why.
How is audio data transmitted, stored, and encrypted?
Users’ voice data needs to be protected from the moment it leaves their device to the moment it's eventually deleted. In practice, this means:
Audio should be encrypted in transit using strong protocols like TLS 1.2 or higher. This protects data as it moves between your system and the STT API.
Once received, data should also be encrypted at rest, ideally using AES-256. This widely accepted encryption standard is used by governments and banks, and most reputable providers have followed suit.
Confirm how long data is retained and whether you can control or configure data retention policies. You may have your own requirements to delete data after a certain processing period, so you need this to be an easy process.
For very sensitive use cases, check if the vendor supportscustomer-managed encryption keys (CMK), data redaction before storage, or zero day retention policies.
Can we control data residency for compliance purposes?
Regions like the EU, UK, and certain U.S. states have specific rules about where data is stored, and how it moves between jurisdictions. Where information lives is known as “data residency.”
Ask if the vendor supports regional data residency, meaning you can choose where your data is processed and stored (including Europe, the U.S., Asia, and more). Some important principles to know:
For GDPR compliance, EU customer data should remain within the EU or be protected by approved cross-border transfer mechanisms(like standard contractual clauses).
Some industries or clients (like the public sector, or finance) may have strict requirements that mandate local data processing only.
Ideally, the vendor should offer configurable settings for data routing and storage at the account or project level.
Again, what matters most is that the vendor can meet your specific requirements. And hopefully you can manage data storage with little fuss or effort.
What access controls and user permissions are available?
Granular control over who can access transcription data helps prevent internal data leaks and supports compliance. This may be specifically required to meet compliance standards, but also gives you more control and security over data in general.
Check if the vendor offers role-based access control (RBAC), so you can assign different permissions to admins, reviewers, developers, and others. Ask whether you can restrict access to sensitive transcripts, redact private information by default, or apply read-only roles.
Look as well for support for organization-level user management, including integrations with single sign-on (SSO) or identity providers (e.g. Okta, Azure AD).
The ability to audit and log access is also key. It ensures you can track who accessed what and when.
What are your policies on data retention and deletion?
Even if your STT vendor is secure, unnecessary data storage still increases risk. Retention policies should match your compliance and customer commitments.
Ask if you can configurehow long transcripts and audio are stored. This could range from minutes to months, depending on your needs. The vendor should also offer the option to delete information automatically, either immediately after processing or on a schedule. This minimizes long-term data exposure.
Also confirm whether deletion is complete and irreversible, and whether it applies to all copies and backups.
Finally, if you're in a regulated industry or working under GDPR/CCPA, the vendor must be able to delete or export personal data on request by the end user. Again, it’s not enough that this is technically possible—you need it to be efficient and easy in practice.
Your perfect partner takes security and compliance seriously
As voice-driven platforms scale, data security and regulatory compliance become essential. Choosing a speech-to-text API is about finding a partner who aligns with yoursecurity posture, compliance obligations, and customer trust expectations.
Before evaluating vendors, take time to clarify your own requirements—the kinds of data you handle, where it’s stored, who needs access, and what regulations apply to your industry or geography. From there, ask the right questions and look for API providers who offer transparency, certifications, and shared responsibility in protecting your users' data.
The right partner won’t just meet today's needs, they’ll help you stay compliant and secure as your platform, customers, and regulatory environment evolve.
Want to see if Gladia’s STT API is right for your product? Talk to our team.
Contact us
Your request has been registered
A problem occurred while submitting the form.
Read more
Speech-To-Text
Real-time agent assist: Unlocking better call center services with speech-to-text
Customer service is evolving fast to meet new challenges. Today's clients expect immediate, accurate answers to increasingly specific queries and complaints. Meanwhile, contact centers need to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and maintain compliance…all while delivering exceptional experiences.
Even the most advanced speech-to-text (STT) systems can make mistakes, especially when they encounter unfamiliar words like brand names, technical acronyms, or non-standard pronunciations. For call centers and customer service platforms, these missteps aren’t just minor glitches. They can lead to broken workflows, misinterpreted customer needs, and frustrating experiences on both ends of the call.
Call center quality assurance: How AI is transforming quality at scale
CCaaS and BPO providers live and die by the quality of the customer experience they deliver. Clients rely on them not just to answer calls, but to do so with consistency, professionalism, empathy, and accuracy every time.